Saturday, November 28, 2009
four hours
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Frustration
I am happy with the writing in this piece. But writing has never been the hard part for me. Again and again, I lack focus. I always come up with a story that takes on way more than I could deal with in 1000 words, then proceeds to only touch on some issues, as opposed to taking the time to really get in depth with one particular story. After speaking with Ron about this, I realized that this is what I felt was missing in the piece – any amount of depth. I seem to always be a “surface” writer. I should be writing stories about shopping, and puppies, and things that don’t really need deeper meaning, because that seems to be beyond my grasp. A ladies magazine, perhaps? I could write about the top five dishes to feed your man during the holidays, or something.
Okay, enough sarcasm. I love writing, and I have to accept that there are some challenges that I am facing. I believe Ron said something to the affect that if you aren’t struggling, you aren’t really learning anything. So, I can face the fact that I have a lot of work ahead of me as I continue to improve. It’s okay that I have to improve. I mean, you never stop improving unless you’re dead, right?
Saturday, November 21, 2009
star suckers and media intergrity
Hello all,
Friday, November 20, 2009
How can one spell Frustrated four times?
I wrote an article for Shauna's class on Air Canada and their third quarter results (as I am in the Business beat, and assumed this is what the business beat wanted of me);I included three proper sources with all the same opinions about the airline: because of Air Canada's new 7 per cent commission paid to Canadian travel agents for selling Tango based fares, and their new policies on capacity management (meaning, selling off more tango based fares as opposed to other fuller fares), the company was seeing a "profit" except more and more passengers were flying on tango fares, which in theory should lead to a decrease in Air Profit. The only reason they showed a "positive increase" was because of the rising currency exchange rate, and the lowering cost of fuel... this, my dear readers, meant that Air Canada had not seen any kind of profit, besides the profit they did not see coming.
But after all this research and the hardwork, the late nights and the many cups of coffee, my article was not good enough and needed to be "revised" (as per Shauna). This, even though I enjoy criticism (in small quantities), was not something I wanted to hear.
After receiving a beat that I had no intention of writing, I was not too thrilled: throughout the class, I have been trying my best to come up with interesting topics, and trying my best to write proper pieces even without the proper instruction of how to write proper articles. When Shauna gave me criticism for the first time, it was quite a major blow to my ego. I know that I am a good writer, even though I devote too much time and effort to a story... and I understand that I spend way too long on a story to have it be perfect and without faults and that I should change my habits. But old habits die hard.
Relating to my Air Canada story, I remember for the first time since I started this semester that I did not want to put too much "effort" into it, even though I was stressed beyond belief that it wouldn't fair too well with Shauna.
After coming up with a focus I believed would be good enough for her, and writing the entire story under an influence of "don't-put-too-much-hard-work-in-it", Shauna hated it. I was insulted, angered, saddened, on the brink of a major melt-down and fully wanting to drop out. I could not understand why I was having so many troubles in writing my pieces, even though everyone else seemed to be spitting out story after story for the Journal and spending as little time as possible on each one. I was (and still am!) frustrated that I have to put so much care and effort, and have to devote so much of my precious time into each of my stories just to have it make the grade while everyone else seems to be working out just fine.
I don't really know what else to say here, but I ended up rewriting my entire Air Canada story with the help of a little Vodka and some Chambord, and I think the piece is actually alot better than what I had originally written. I still have yet to discover what I can learn from this experience, but I'm sure when I am writing my last two articles, I will look back at my traumatic experience and remember that, though I should develop stories quickly, that I should never deny myself my own perfection... if that makes any sense.
On to story four...
Thursday, November 19, 2009
no longer slitting my wrists...
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Nottingham!
One more to go! Bring it on, baby!
Monday, November 16, 2009
Okay... so here it is....
Saturday, November 14, 2009
Do not Panic...
the clock is ticking
Monday, November 9, 2009
Puzzles Everywhere
One of the stories that I am currently working on has to do with Air Canada and it's financial situation during the economic recession...however, interviewing employees of travel agencies (one of the three sources I wish to use for supporting background information) is getting to be harder than I initially expected.
One of my previous goals that I set for myself was to focus less time on stories and more time focusing on getting my stories done (as per Ron). However effortless it was to research and come up with a perfect topic, the search for my needed sources was where my problems arose. Conducting my two first interviews was easy. The complications began when I needed information from a travel agent. I went to Flight Centre just to talk to an employee of the store, and before I could even ask for a name, I was given a number to simply call the employers' head office. I needed a good quote from a regular employee who dealt with flight bookings everday, and the grown man recommended I search elsewhere within the company. After two consequetive days with no luck, I lost hope and gave into contacting the media relations agent for Flight Centre.
The Rewards are Worthwhile
I guess I can safely say I can put my Berlin Wall story behind me. This story really took over my life for awhile – tons of leg work, and tons of time trying to find someone to publish this!
This story started simply out of personal interest. I had been reading the history of post-war Berlin over the summer, and realized it would be the 20th anniversary of the wall coming down this year. So, good idea to write a story on this, right? As I quickly found out, a story “about the Berlin Wall” wasn’t exactly focused enough for a story, so I had to find my focus. And to find my focus, I first had to find my sources. At this point, it didn’t look likely that the story was going to come together.
But I was persistent. I called the Calgary German Association, who directed me to the German store Eidelweiss. There, the manager promised me she would see if any of her employees lived in Berlin during that period. I assumed this was a dead end.
I also contacted the dean of the history program at University of Calgary, seeing if there was any faculty he could direct me towards. I was hoping at best to get the academic historical perspective of what the Berlin Wall falling down. He gave me two names, although I quickly found out that they both were actually in Berlin for the semester. The two professors had different attitudes though: one was a definite “no, please don’t ever speak to me again.” And the other was more than happy to talk to me.
The logistics to speak with my German professor in Berlin was tricky, as she was globetrotting all over the world, and I had a deadline I was working with. Somehow, though, it all came together and I got a rather emotional account of a young woman’s view on the fall of the Berlin Wall, and how it affected her career from that moment. That interview was gold.
My work into finding the German community in Calgary actually panned out as well. Eidelweiss got back to me with a name, an employee of theirs who had recently moved to Calgary from East Germany, and had grown up in a communist police state. I went over to her house, where I spoke with both her and her companion, also from East Germany. Language issues aside, I had a wonderful time speaking to them about their experiences, and I found them to be the loveliest couple. I even got their pictures with some memories of their first time at the Berlin Wall. It worked out quite nicely.
My last interview I didn’t have to look too far to get. Carolina’s dad grew up in Czechoslovakia, and escaped the communist regime in 1968. Wow – fascinating guy. We spoke about his time growing up in Czechoslovakia, and visiting Berlin later in life.
So, I had all my interviews, and I had to put this together in a way that made sense, and hopefully would catch the reader’s eye as well. I think my first effort was good, not great, and it’s wonderful to go through the process of vetting, to see what other people see that you totally looked over. The story began to take shape, and I felt ready to put this forth for publishing in the Calgary Journal.
But they did not want it! It was too timely for the print edition, and the web editor felt that the issue wasn’t one that Calgarians would actually care about. I believe her actual words were: I don’t see why Calgarians should care now, 20 years later. I had a difference of opinion, to say the least, but I was someone attached to my story at this point.
Ron suggested I try publishing it elsewhere, Fast Forward or the Herald. I thought – how silly, but I’m not actually losing anything by trying. I emailed an editor at the Herald, who directed me to the right section for this story. And then I waited. The longer I didn’t hear back, the more I was sure they weren’t going to publish this. I even went so far as to give the editor an ultimatum. He got back to me after his time was up, and totally called my bluff. He told me he was still interested, and I committed to the Herald.
Late Friday night, I see I have an email from him, asking me to make some changes to the story, add some quotes. He had written earlier in the day, and I didn’t receive it until later in the night, but there was no mention of deadlines or when the story might be published. I was just kind of excited that things looked promising, and got up really early the next day and made the asked-for changes. Then, I looked at the paper, and saw my story staring up at me (from a teaser on the front page of the Herald!): Calgarians share their memories, page A16. I was a little shocked, as I had not expected that to happen. I was a little chagrined that I had missed my deadline for the changes my editor wanted, but mostly I was pretty ecstatic that I had been published.
This story was a lot of work, but at the end of the day it was worth it to see my byline, to know that people who have never met me are reading my work. I learnt a lot on this assignment. I think perhaps the most important thing is that it doesn’t necessarily matter how good of a writer you are (although it helps, for sure), it’s about finding the right story that people are going to care about. I was personally interested in the fall of the Berlin Wall, and as it turned out, so was the rest of the world. I was able to pick up on a timely story, and make it work for what I was doing. So I should just keep on doing that, I guess.
Next time, though, I want to be paid!